1 Million Trees

Category:

Location/Scale:

Borneo (Regional)

Implementing Organisation:

Fairventures Worldwide and Borneo Institute

Period:

2014 – now

In a nutshell

1m Trees is a joint program by German NGO Fairventures Worldwide and the local foundation Borneo Institute in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. The aim of the program is to revitalize deforested and degraded land with a successional multi-species agroforestry system. First, it is about utilizing the soil-improving qualities of pioneer tree species to create a basis for the cultivation of fruit trees and vegetables. In a second step, the fertility of the area is further enhanced with compost and permaculture techniques. The livelihoods are then diversified by planting fruit trees and timber species with longer rotations. The fast growing timber can be harvested after 5-8 years, is relevant for the wood industry and provides a livelihood for the local population, while the vegetables and fruit improve nutrition and food security.

The program is contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), especially SDG 1 (Poverty reduction) and SDG 15 (Sustainable Forestry) among many others. 1m Trees also showcases how Forest Landscape Restoration and agroforestry, as one approach of agroecology, could look like in practice. The goal is to generate incomes for the local population and protect the environment and the climate simultaneously.

 

 

 

Context

Large parts of rainforest were cut down in the rural areas of Central Kalimantan. The remaining forests are severely threatened by population pressure, legal and illegal logging and the ongoing expansion of palm oil plantations. In most of the deforested areas, soils are extremely degraded, as the thin layer of fertile soil has eroded and the natural nutrient cycling of the vegetation ceased. This is a major concern for rural communities, whose traditional livelihoods depend on forestry, slash and burn agriculture on small plots and limited sales of rubber and other cash crops from the rainforest. Only the sustainable and natural rehabilitation of infertile areas can help local communities to improve their livelihoods.

Objective

In cooperation with local communities, fairventures is restoring the fertility of 1,000 hectares of deforested and strongly degraded soil in Central Kalimantan and reforesting these areas with mixed species systems. The ultimate goal is to provide an example for integrative and successful Forest Landscape Restoration and to develop methods and economic models that allow to restore degraded lands on a large scale.

By end of 2018, local communities will have planted the one million trees with the strong support of fairventures. Starting 2019, fairventures will strive towards a new goal: 100 million trees in diverse, but not too complex planting combinations.

Key Interventions

Farm level:

  • Forest Landscape Restoration: Support farmers to restore former forest areas that are barren and unproductive today. Farmers have the opportunity to participate in trainings and receive seedlings, enabling them to establish so-called multi-species agroforestry systems. Those are a combination of fast-growing valuable timber (e.g. Sengon), fruit trees and nutritious plants such as cassava, peanuts or vegetables.

Regional/national Level:

  • Value Chain Approach: Support farmers to become engaged in the timber value chain by planting fast-growing lightwood timber species that are used in many sectors, replacing hardwoods. Further, the Indonesian wood processing industry is supported to develop new products based on lightwood and to market them, both nationally and internationally
  • Digitalization and Monitoring: Measuring and monitoring the impact of the program activities are an important element. Data has been collected on tree growth under different conditions and have documented exactly where, when and by whom the trees were planted. Thus, the understanding of the connections between soil, climate and planting combinations are improved year by year.

Lessons Learned/challenges

The replanting of trees stops erosion, restores water and nutrient cycles and thus soils, and mitigates climate change, as the growing trees absorb carbon from the air and thereby neutralize it. At the same time, farmers are able to produce food for their own consumption and timber and other cash crops for sale, improving their livelihoods.

Relevant Links & references

 

 

 

Agro-Ecological Transition in the South

Category:

Location/Scale:

The Global South, including Madagascar and Burkina Faso in Africa (International)

Implementing Organisation:

CIRAD (French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development)

Period:

2003 – now

In a nutshell

CIRAD identified agroecology as one of its top research priority, focusing on how agro-ecological systems function and assessing their capacity as credible alternatives to conventional production models.

CIRAD’s work on agroecology encompasses several organizational levels – plant, cropping system, farm, rural organization, value chain and territory. Three key research topics were identified: making use of biodiversity, designing systems and supporting transition.

Its research approach associates diagnoses, knowledge generation and use of local know-how, capacity building and support of innovation processes.

CIRAD is building novel interdisciplinary expertise and operational solutions to ensure the agro-ecological transition in farming systems in the South.

 

 

 

Context

The biophysical conditions in which Sub-Saharan agriculture is practised are notable for their contrasting climates (droughts or too much water), conditions which favour pest development, and poor, fragile soils. For a variety of reasons, it is often difficult to apply conventional intensification solutions in the poorest countries. These include rapid population growth, the withdrawal of the State, the influence of the globalized agro-industry, the lack of investment and inadequate services. Sustainable production methods need to be developed which not only take into account those constraints, but also make the most of opportunities: markets, resources and local expertise.

Objective

CIRAD workstream on agroecology aims to understand the biophysical mechanisms and interactions at play within farming systems to boost natural regulation processes and resource use efficiency.

They also seek to design locally adapted agro-ecological production systems and assess their performance.

As CIRAD has many local partners, another important goal is to support transition to agroecology with the help and involvement of multiple stakeholders.

Research

Farm level:

  • Replacing synthetic inputs like fossil fuels, fertilizers and pesticides
  • Improving the use of natural resources by using inter-, cover- and service crops
  • Encouraging agroforestry, rotations and crop-livestock systems to increase synergies

Regional/national Level:

  • Participatory breeding systems
  • Cutting marketing and transaction costs to speed up agro-ecological transition
  • Connecting research findings and local knowledge to achieve practical, efficient solutions

Lessons Learned/challenges

One challenge is how to organize the continuous transition from conventional agriculture to agro-ecology and how to deal with the extra costs that come with it. Additionally, one needs to pay greater attention to labour productivity and to improving working conditions, since the agro-ecological transition is often labour-intensive and based on practices that involve taking extra care of crops.

Relevant Links & references

 

 

 

Collaborative Crop Research Program

Category:

Location/Scale:

West, East and South Africa, Andes-South America (Local and National)

Implementing Organisation:

McKnight Foundation

Period:

1983 – now

In a nutshell

The Collaborative Crop Research Program (CCRP) funds participatory, collaborative research on agroecological intensification, bringing smallholder farmers, researchers, and development professionals together to create technology to improve nutrition, livelihoods, and productivity for farming communities.

The CCRP provides grants to local and national grantees participating in communities of practice in the following four regions: Andes, Eastern Africa, Southern Africa, and West Africa. Those actors bring deep knowledge of the regions in which they work and collaborate among themselves and with other stakeholders on solutions to poverty and food insecurity. CCRP regional teams provide direct support to strengthen their capacity, foster innovation, and explore pathways to take technologies and processes to scale.

 

 

Context

The CCRP has been established over 30 years and now works in multiple countries which belong to the poorest and most food insecure in the world (including Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger, Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda in Africa and Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru in South America). The program was built in response to concerns that communities in those countries are starving due to a combination of poor crop production, increasing population, political conflict and climate change.

Objective

CCRP strives to improve access to local, sustainable, nutritious food using collaborative research and knowledge sharing with smallholder farmers, research institutions, and development organizations.

Research

Farm level:

  • Biological nitrogen fixation with legumes to improve soil fertility and provide a greater diet diversification
  • Conservation of agricultural biodiversity and resilience (to climate change and diseases) through breeding and variety selection
  • Integrated crop and pest management
  • Traditional knowledge as a key to success

Regional/national Level:

  • Seed distribution systems
  • Promoting of farmer-driven innovation and supporting farmer organizations
  • Bring together multiple stakeholders to find collaborative solutions through a Community of Practice rather than top-down implementations

Lessons Learned/challenges

The most crucial point for success in collaborative research is the inclusion of all types of stakeholders by developing a community of practice and building the necessary trust. Especially, integrating smallholder farmers within the research program ensured greater impact. Additionally, it is important to do research on a broad spectrum of disciplines and issues, including agricultural techniques on the farm level, as well as policy and market development on the big scale.

Relevant Links & references

 

 

 

Soils, Food and Healthy Communities

Category:

Location/Scale:

Malawi (National)

Implementing Organisation:

Cornell University

Period:

2000 – now

In a nutshell

The Soils, Food and Healthy Communities (SFHC) project works to empower smallholder farmers in Malawi to build sustainable, healthy and resilient communities. Farmer-led, participatory research based on ecological approaches is the most important component of the approach. This includes strengthening local indigenous knowledge and democratic processes to address inequalities in Malawi.

The programme consist of various activities to educate and empower farmers. Special attention is put to the role of women and the Malawian youth. SFHC introduces a set of agroecological practices on the farm level, promotes local orange maize varieties and organizes recipe days to improve the diversity of diets and the role of men in their households.

 

 

Context

Malawi has a current population of over 16 million. About 80% of the inhabitants live in rural areas and rely on agriculture for their food and livelihoods. Malawi is one of the poorest countries in the world with over 70% of the population living below the poverty line. An estimated one-third of Malawian households experience chronic food insecurity and calorie deficiencies. High rates of gender inequality in Malawi has contributed to these high rates of food insecurity and malnutrition, as women have little control over agricultural decisions, experience high levels of physical violence, and have lower education and training opportunities.

Objective

All of the project activities focus on improving soil fertility, child nutrition and food security. For example, seed distribution and farmer training and annual field days are important elements to achieve these goals. The project has also integrated several activities to promote agricultural, nutritional and social practices, especially for the poor, HIV-infected and other marginalized groups.

Key Interventions/Research

Farm level:

  • Planting legumes for natural nitrogen fixation
  • Incorporating crop residues for improved soil fertility
  • Improved food diversity and preparation, especially for young children

Regional/national Level:

  • Seed distribution systems
  • Farmer Research Team(FRT) derived from village communities
  • Organization of training camps
  • Organization of field days and exchange visits to show fellow farmers the use and impact of agroecology (farmer-to-farmer)
  • Developing local food enterprises to improve income

Lessons Learned/challenges

A key for success in this project is the increasing support of the government, which has not always been there. Because of their agriculture input subsidy program, they were not fond of this project at first. However, support has risen over time and now the extension staff of the ministry of agriculture are taking part in training and field days. At the moment, only a small part of government money goes into agroecology as they still have the input subsidy program where the most part of the money flows into.

Relevant Links & references

 

 

FARMER – RESEARCHER PARTNERSHIP, SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA

Category:

Location/Scale:

Santa Cruz, California (Subnational)

Implementing Organisation:

University of California at Santa Cruz (UCSC) – Agroecology Program

Period:

1988 – now

In a nutshell

This example is documenting how strawberry monocultures turned into sustainable agroecosystems through a 30-year farmer-researcher partnership.

It all started with a research partnership between a farmer and a researcher for agroecological transition of the conventional monoculture strawberry production. Step by step, changes and improvements of the practices, thereby proofing the feasibility in the field, has been a successful approach to drive a sustainability transformation. Through adoption of the practices by other farmers and companies in the region and an increased consumer awareness, organic production has scaled up, leading to an 8-fold increase of organic strawberry production between 1997 and 2016. At the later stage of the transformation also direct marketing was a key to success to provide market incentives for the farmers.

 

 

 

Context

Monterey and Santa Cruz counties account for about half of the total California strawberry crop, producing more than $953 million worth of strawberries on 13,063 acres in 2016. Strawberry production has traditionally been done in a very conventional, water and chemical input intensive way. In 2017, a key fumigant, MeBR, was nationally banned, increasing the demand for and transformation to sustainable alternatives.

Objective

The main goal was to redesign traditional large-scale monoculture strawberry production systems into an agroecological system through a researcher-farmer partnership by starting on one model farm and subsequent scaling improvements step-by-step and upscaling.

Key Interventions/Research

Farm level:

  • Stepwise input substitution
  • Model farm through farmer-researcher partnership
  • «push-pull» pest management techniques
  • Sophisticated crop rotations, intercropping
  • Comprehensive, system-wide redesign that nurtures complexity and diversity

Regional/national Level:

  • Provision of access to research to solve upcoming challenges in the field (research-partnership)
  • Alternative network for direct sales

Lessons Learned/challenges

This example of a larger scale transformation of strawberry monocultures is indicating that with sufficient resources, time and support from (participatory) research, transformations of a system in a very sceptical setting- the approach was considered radical – is possible.

To provide a price incentive and compensate the higher labour costs, decreased input costs and a direct sales system were also a key success factor to support this transition

The challenges for the future are mainly environmental ones such as soil erosion, nutrient leaching, groundwater depletion and saltwater intrusion.

Relevant Links & references

Food Security & Sovereignty in Las Segovias, Nicaragua

Category:

Location/Scale:

Nicaragua (National)

Implementing Organisation:

CAN (Community Agroecology Network)

Period:

2009 – now

In a nutshell

The Food Security and Sovereignty in Las Segovias Project is a collaboration between CAN and PRODECOOP, a coffee farmer cooperative organization. The project aims to improve food security and reduce seasonal hunger among 1500 smallholder coffee farming families in Northern Nicaragua.

CAN engaged in a participatory planning process to define strategies based on recognized needs to establish year-round access to healthy food in participating rural communities.

One important pillar of this project are the corn storage and distribution centres (CADA). The CADAs help farmers to store their harvest centrally and use it in thin months for the whole community. A second pillar are the seven seed banks to provide farmers with quality seed (mainly corn and beans) all year long.  A third aspect is the diversification of farms especially with fruit trees, cassava, plantain and sweet potatoes, which has always been practiced in South America.

 

 

 

Context

In Nicaragua, seasonal hunger is one of the biggest challenges. Food insecurity has especially risen since the coffee-leave rust outbreak in 2011 and the start of a drought in 2014. Central America has seen a succession of droughts, hurricanes, and other hazards in the past decade and is likely to be hit by the threats of climate change in the future more often.

Nationwide, the prevalence of undernourishment dropped from 55% to 20% between 1990 and 2010 and several government assistance programs have expanded. Despite these gains, food insecurity remains a pressing challenge among many rural Nicaraguan smallholders.

Objective

The main goals of this project are improved food availability, access, and food utilization through CADAs, seed banks, farm diversification and experimentation, and organizational capacity building in order to reduce seasonal hunger and erase undernourishment among children.

Key Interventions

Farm level:

  • Distribution of fruit trees and different varieties of vegetables to enhance diversification
  • Metal silos have been distributed to improve grain storage methods and reduced rates of grain spoilage and loss

Regional/national Level:

  • Build food storage and distribution centres known as CADAs to mitigate hunger in thin months
  • Construction of seedbanks, which are operating and helping seed production, especially corn and beans, mitigating the impacts of harvest loss and responding to the farmers’ seed demand with efficiency and availability of quality seed
  • Training, research, dissemination, and ongoing farmer and promoter development

Lessons Learned/challenges

The Participation Action Research implemented by the project allowed to refine the set of strategies that are the most needed by farmers through constant feedback and reflexion on lessons learned. Four more strategies were added to the original three, such as increase household capacity and access to seed and rootstock production.

Another lesson is that the elimination of the thin months and reaching every single family, their cooperatives and communities is a slow process. The cumulative effects of multiple hazards remains the main challenge. For instance, the coffee leaf rust and other pests that has affected nearly all coffee farming families, adds up to the effect of drought.

There is also a need to promote strategies for the preservation of local and patrimonial varieties, especially in consideration of climate change adaptation and the lack of water.

Relevant Links & references

 

 

Syprobio

Category:

Location/Scale:

Mali, Burkina Faso, Benin (International)

Implementing Organisation:

FiBL (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Switzerland)

Period:

2010 – now

In a nutshell

SYPROBIO is active in three West-African countries and seeks to combine and strengthen the knowledge and creativity of researchers, technicians and local farmers to address problems related to food security and adaptation to climate change. They set up ten representative circles of concerted actors to find sustainable solutions in order to enhance resilience based on the principles of agroecology and prove that they work. Together they defined 27 innovative practices for on-farm research. Those innovations came from different domains like soil fertility, seed, plant health, cultivation and socio-economy. Through these farmer-led innovation platforms new practices are tested and introduced and comparative research on the economic and agronomic differences is done.

 

 

 

 

 

Context

The current social, economic, climatic and ecologic situation in West Africa constitutes both practical and intellectual challenges. Soil degradation, pests, food insecure farmers, climate change, rural-urban inequalities and fragile societal structures are just a few problems that the region has to deal with. Agriculture is in the middle of this multidimensional complex.

Objective

The innovations shall improve food security and climate change adaptation. The national research partners conduct on–station research in order to complement the on-farm research to provide further evidence on scientific differences between various farming practices, categorized into organic simple and diversified, conventional low and high input farming.

Research

Farm Level:

  • Introduction of varieties more resilient to pests and weeds
  • Usage of bio pesticides and organic manure to reduce synthetic inputs
  • Intercropping using local varieties and trap plants to increase nutrient efficiency and reduce application of pesticides

Regional/National Level:

  • Self-organized farmer groups to improve capacities to analyse and make decisions
  • Circles of concerted actors (CCA) to bring together different stakeholders and to develop practicable sustainable solutions (based on the research)
  • Innovation platforms (IP) as social systems to promote appropriate technologies (that enhance resilience and solve its member’s problems).

Lessons Learned/Challenges

The main concern of the farmers is the low soil fertility with low potential to yield increase without external inputs. Also producing sufficient compost is difficult with a lack of animals little water, few machines.

Farmers also struggle with lacking means of communication, institutional instability and high costs for field visits by researchers. In order to scale up the practices of SYPROBIO communication between science, economy and politics needs to improve.

Relevant Links & References

 

 

 

EcoDry

Category:

Location/Scale:

Spain, Jordan, South Africa, Mexico and other countries (International)

Implementing Organisation:

Coventry University

Period:

2014 – 2017

In a nutshell

The Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience (CAWR) at Coventry University is leading the project EcoDry that aims to enhance understanding and share knowledge on agroecological strategies to build the resilience of farming systems in dryland and drought situations that includes improved water management in general. The project brings together partners from the UK, Spain, Mexico, South Africa and Jordan.

The EcoDry project is about cooperation and exchange between the different research centres, allowing testing different agroecological practices and research and extension techniques in different contexts. These will enable the construction of common methodologies and approaches to address the challenges of dry lands and drought in the context global climate change.

The project contributed to a bank of knowledge about innovative best practices for adapting to drought or flooding conditions and develop methods for working with farmers to implement these practices.

 

 

 

Context

Drought is one of the major constraints affecting food security and livelihoods of more than two billion people that reside on dry areas which constitute 41% of the world’s land surface. In dry areas, the integration between farming practices and water management is a key point to enhance the resilience of production system to drought.

Objective

The EcoDry joint exchange project aims to enhance understanding and share knowledge on strategies to build the resilience of farming systems to natural and man-made impacts in dryland and drought situations, including climate change, through collaboration of joint research and capacity building activities between participating universities.

In particular, the sub-objectives of the project is 1) to identify and build a body of knowledge on innovative agroecological strategies to mitigate threats of natural and man-made nature for drylands and drought, 2) to build a network of expertise on agroecological innovations through workshops, conferences and seminars, 3) to provide opportunities for research on cutting-edge agroecological approaches in the natural and social sciences for postgraduate students.

Research

Farm Level:

  • Carbon farming to mitigate climate change, eco-intensification, energy efficient agriculture,  evolutionary plant breeding,
  • Rainwater harvesting, agroforestry, permaculture
  • Organic and biodynamic production techniques
  • Peri-urban agriculture to meet food and livelihood needs
  • Commercial cattle production as a resilient livelihood option for smallholders
  • Resilience of agricultural ecosystems to biological invasion
  • Compost and foliar sprays for improved rooibos tea growth and yield

Regional/National Level:

  • Rituals for resilience: reviving food and arts practices for socio-ecological restoration
  • Human water governance
  • Knowledge exchange between researchers: seminar, exchange trips, teaching

Lessons Learned/Challenges

The close exchange between hundreds of researchers, multiple research groups and universities had a substantial impact on existing research and teaching facilities, consolidated by training programs and mobility programs for talented researchers. One of the key lesson of the project is on the importance of building a community of practices and enhancing networks among researchers that contributed significantly to promoting frameworks agroecological strategies for drought mitigation. The pooling of evidence and experience contributed to building sustainable drought mitigation that influence both policy and practice.

Relevant Links & References

 

 

 

Enhancing Resilience in Food Systems

Category:

Location/Scale:

Subsaharan Africa (Local and National)

Implementing Organisation:

ETH Zurich

Period:

2013 – now

In a nutshell

In this research initiative, the ETH Zürich World Food System Center, the Sustainable Agroecosystems Group, the Climate Policy Group, and the TdLab aim to develop a practice-oriented toolkit to assess the resilience and outcomes in food value chains, and to support the design of interventions by decision-makers. Through a holistic vision of food systems, the toolkit generates a database of knowledge in resilience and helps to identify key points of actions. The assessment tool accounts for the complex interactions and feedbacks that can occur at different scales, between processes, stakeholders, drivers (such as environmental change), and outcomes of food systems (such as food security, environmental and social welfare).

The tool is also designed to be used by practitioners, balancing simplicity of use and reliability of results.

Participatory and integrated assessments of various food value chains were performed to to test the concept and collect experience , including for tef in Ethiopia, cocoa, tomatoes and bananas in Ghana.

 

 

Context

With rapid environmental and climate changes, and more frequent economic, social and political shocks than ever, food systems around the world need to become more resilient in order to achieve food security for a growing global population.

In order to tackle the complexity of food systems today, decision-makers around the world have to take into account many factors. They need to be able to estimate where and how they can make the necessary changes, without making things worse elsewhere. They also need to know if such changes will allow the system to carry on functioning despite disturbances (such as natural disasters, market-related shocks, political crises, etc.).

Objective

The objective of the initiative is to develop a method to evaluate the viability of action measures to enhance the resilience of value chain activities.

It also aims to apply the method to various cases studies to engage stakeholders and to draw lessons on the barriers and challenges in implementing resilience measures

Research

Farm Level (for the case study in Ghana):

  • Irrigation technologies/systems
  • Early mature varieties
  • Weather forecast
  • Reduced tillage and mulching
  • Improved harvesting technologies
  • Shade trees/agroforestry

Regional/national Level:

  • Developing guidelines to assess resilience in food value chains
  • Developing a toolkit to support the management of trade-offs between outcomes
  • Identifying the potential of farm level interventions, as well as the barriers and challenges across sites to scale it up

Lessons Learned/challenges

Farmers got very limited governmental support to implement different new methods. They also received little information from extension services to learn about new technologies. Additionally, some of the interventions require some investment, which is not possible for all farmers to do. Finally, for irrigation and bookkeeping, farmers lacked field evidence of the viability; hence, specific approaches need to be develop to convince farmers of the value of those interventions

Relevant Links & references

 

Climate-Smart Villages

Category:

Location/Scale:

Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America,

Asia (International)

Implementing Organisation:

CCAFS and CGIAR

Period:

2011 – now

In a nutshell

CSV aims to generate evidence at local scales of what climate-smart agricultural options work best, where, why, and how. They use this evidence to distil lessons learned for policy makers, agricultural development practitioners and investors from local to global levels.

The main goal is to contribute to food and nutritional security and poverty reduction under climate change. Where possible, the programme also aims at reducing GHG emissions.

On a local scale CSV helps smallholder farmers to adapt their agricultural practices to secure reliable food supplies and livelihoods. For this purpose CSV advises to rear local breeds of goat and sheep and diversify crop varieties.

Context

The project was launched in 2011 with 15 climate-smart villages in West Africa, East Africa and South Asia. Additional villages joined in 2014 in Latin America and Southeast Asia.

All the villages are situated in high-risk areas, which will likely suffer most from a changing climate. Villages are also locations where local partners have already established vital links with communities.

Objective

CSV wants to understand the effectiveness of CSA options (practices, technologies, services, programs, and policies) to enhance productivity, raise incomes and to build climate resilience. Furthermore, the programme tests and identifies successful adoption incentives, finance opportunities, institutional arrangements and scaling out/up mechanisms.

Key Interventions/Research

Farm level:

  • Introducing new breeds of small ruminants (sheep and goat) which are more resilient to drought and disease (Galla Goat, Red Maasai Sheep)
  • Drought tolerant varieties of maize and sorghum
  • Diversifying crops to be more resilient (drought, diseases): Cassava that resists the deadly mosaic virus, sweet potatoes that are better adapted to low moisture in the minor season, tissue culture bananas that resist the bacterial wilt disease
  • Introducing Mangoes as well as pawpaw trees to diversify diet and livelihood
  • Strategic grazing management

Regional/national Level:

  • Mainstreaming climate change into national agriculture plans
  • Participatory action research to improve a variety of crops
  • Consultative meetings with a range of stakeholders to raise awareness of climate change
  • Establishing of learning sites in various regions of the participating countries
  • Supporting women and youth primarily by utilizing transformative approaches to empower women and communicating via social channels
  • Implementation of an index-based insurance scheme

Lessons Learned/challenges

The practices of CSV, like water management or mitigation options, have not been adapted in some regions. One factor that contributes to low uptake of new technologies is that development practitioners lack evidence of how the innovations can be practically incorporated into agricultural systems. They need to know how farmers can achieve synergies and minimize trade-offs in implementing multiple interventions on real farms. Climate change complicates this because its impacts will vary across locations. Effective implementation therefore requires an integrated approach in which science, technology, and decision making interact with local socioeconomic conditions and culture.

Relevant Links & references