Key characteristics of diversified agroecological farming
Principles and dimensions of agroecology
Dimensions of sustainable food system
Nicholls, Altieri et al. 2016
Beacons of Hope
Minimize losses of energy, water, nutrients and genetic resources by enhancing conservation and regeneration of soil and water resources and agrobiodiversity
Low external inputs
Environmental dimension: AE eliminates the use of and dependency on external synthetic inputs by enabling farmers to control pests, weeds and improve fertility through ecological management.
Nature/ecological dimension: resource efficiency, reduce external inputs
Recycling of waste within full nutrient cycling
Enhance the recycling of biomass, with a view to optimizing organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling over time
Environmental dimension: AE optimises and closes resource loops (nutrients, biomass) by recycling existing nutrients and biomass in farming and food systems
Nature/ecological dimension: sustainable water use, reduce waste
Diversify species and genetic resources in the agroecosystem over time and space at the field and landscape level
Temporal and spatial diversification at various scales, including plot, farm and landscape
Use of wide range of species and less uniform, locallyadapted varieties/breeds, based on multiple uses, cultural preferences, taste, productivity and other criteria.
Multiple sources of production, income and livelihood
Environmental dimension: AE builds and conserves life in the soil to provide favourable conditions for plant growth
Environmental dimension: AE optimises and maintains biodiversity above and below ground (a wide range of species and varieties, genetic resources, locally adapted varieties/breeds, etc.) over time and space
Economic dimension: AE promotes diversification of on-farm incomes giving farmers greater financial independence, increases resilience by multiplying sources of production and livelihood, promoting independence from external inputs and reducing crop failure through its diversified system
Nature/ecological dimension: agrobiodiversity, protect forest and trees, agroforestry
Provide the most favorable soil conditions for plant growth, particularly by managing organic matter and by enhancing soil biological activity
Enhance beneficial biological interactions and synergies among the components of agrobiodiversity, thereby promoting key ecological processes and services
Natural synergies emphasized and production types integrated (e.g. mixed croplivestocktree farming systems and landscapes)
Maximization of multiple outputs
Environmental dimension: AE enhances positive interaction, synergy, integration, and complementarities between the elements of agroecosystems (plants, animals, trees, soil, water, etc.) and food systems (water, renewable energy, and the connections of relocalised food chains)
Nature/ecological dimension: healthy fertile soils, delivery of ecosystem services, reduce GHG emissions
Production dimension: multiple forms of food production
Strengthen the “immune system” of agricultural systems through enhancement of functional biodiversity – natural enemies, antagonists, etc., by creating appropriate habitats
Environmental dimension: AE supports climate adaptation and resilience while contributing to greenhouse gas emission mitigation (reduction and sequestration) through lower use of fossil fuels and higher carbon sequestration in soils.
Adaptive/resilience capacity dimension: local adaptation, adaptive capacity, CC resilience, resilience to economic shocks, CO2 sequestration, resilience against pest and disease
CoCreation and Sharing of Knowledge
Socio-cultural dimension: AE is knowledge-intensive and promotes horizontal (farmer-to-farmer) contacts for sharing of knowledge, skills, and innovations, together with alliances giving equal weight to farmer and researcher
Human/creative dimension: education, innovation, creativity
Social/equity dimension: Access extension services
Culture and Food Traditions
Multiple uses (including traditional uses), cultural preferences, taste, productivity and other criteria
Socio-cultural dimension:AE is rooted in the culture, identity, tradition, innovation and knowledge of local communities
Socio-cultural dimension: AE contributes to healthy, diversified, seasonally and culturallyappropriate diets
Socio-cultural dimension: AE supports peoples and communities in maintaining their spiritual and material relationship with their land and environment
Cultural dimension: genetic resources, varieties, food specialities, traditions, customs, celebrate cultural aspects
Human/Creative dimension: sustainable consumption patterns
Production dimension: sensitizes for local and seasonal demand
Circular and Solidarity Economy
Circular economy approaches
Production of a wide range of less homogeneous products often destined for short value chain
Socio-cultural dimension: AE does not necessarily require expensive external certification as it often relies on producer-consumer relations and transactions based on trust, promoting alternatives to certification such as Participatory Guarantee System and Community Supported Agriculture
Economic dimension: AE promotes fair, short distribution networks rather than linear distribution chains and builds a transparent network of relationships between producers and consumers.
Economic dimension: AE primarily helps provide livelihoods for peasant families and contributes to making local markets, economies and employment more robust.
Economic dimension: AE harnesses the power of local markets by enabling food producers to sell their produce at fair prices and respond actively to local market demand.
Economic dimension: AE is built on a vision of a social and solidarity economy
Financial/production dimension: direct link between farmers and consumers, increase farm profitability and yield, regional value generation and access to financial resources
Human/Creative dimension: sustainable consumption patterns
Social/Equity dimension: group, associations, trade unions, marketing, commercialization organization
Human and Social Value
More labor intensive systems
Socio-cultural dimension: AE creates opportunities for and promotion of solidarity and discussion between and among culturally diverse peoples (e.g. different ethnic groups that share the same values yet have different practices) and between rural and urban populations.
Socio-cultural dimension: AE respects diversity between people in terms of gender, race, sexual orientation and religion, creates opportunities for young people and women and encourages women’s leadership and gender equality
Economic dimension: AE reduces dependence on aid and increases community autonomy by encouraging sustainable livelihoods and dignity
Human/creative dimension: food security, healthy and nutritious food, labour opportunities
Social/equity dimension: building of trust, collaborative, celebrational processes, life promoting
Political dimension: AE prioritises the needs and interests of smallscale food producers who supply the majority of the world’s food and it deemphasizes the interests of large industrial food and agricultural systems.
Political dimension: AE puts control of seed, biodiversity, land and territories, water, knowledge and the commons into the hands of the people who are part of the food system and so achieves betterintegrated resource management.
Political dimension: AE can change power relationships by encouraging greater participation of food producers and consumers in decisionmaking on food systems and offers new governance structures.
Political dimension: AE requires a set of supportive, complementary public policies, supportive policymakers and institutions, and public investment to achieve its full potential.
Political dimension: AE encourages forms of social organisation needed for decentralised governance and local adaptive management of food and agricultural systems. It also incentivizes the selforganisation and collective management of groups and networks at different levels, from local to global (farmers organisations, consumers, research organisations, academic institutions, etc).
Political dimension: sustainable policies, food democracy, multistakeholder dialogue, supports evidencebased policymaking, sensitize political food chain actors
Social/equity dimension: land tenure system
Nicholls, C. I., Altieri, M. A., Vazquez, L. 2016 “Agroecology: principles for the conversion and redesign of farming systems”. Journal of Ecosystem and Ecography S, 5.
IPES-Food 2016 “From uniformity to diversity: a paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems”.
GAFF 2018 “Beacons of Hope A Sustainability Transitions Framework for Sustainable Food Systems”. In preparatio